COVID-19 response measures and reducing regulatory barriers to access to legal services
Following a series of Access to Justice Advisory Committee engagement sessions with members of the legal profession that reviewed how measures adopted in response to COVID-19 have improved or hindered access to legal services, the board of Benchers adopted principles to guide policy development aimed at reducing regulatory barriers, for advocating government, the courts and others to maintain certain COVID-19 response measures, and for directing staff to evaluate what changes can be made to regulatory requirements.
Read Responding to COVID-19 and adjusting regulation to improve access to legal services and justice, a report of the Access to Justice Advisory Committee, December 2021.
Background on the consultation
The Law Society sought feedback from members of the legal profession on the effectiveness of measures implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic for improving access to legal services and access to the justice system, as well as ideas for new measures to reduce regulatory barriers that impede clients’ access that the Law Society should explore.
The COVID response measures the Law Society had adopted were intended to make it easier for lawyers to continue to provide legal services despite the challenges of the pandemic. Some examples of what we implemented include:
- a targeted, temporary fee relief program for lawyers who suffered significant financial hardship last year;
- enhanced use of electronic banking;
- remote trust audits;
- permitting online verification of client identification; and
- guidance regarding setting up remote workplaces, secure videoconferencing technologies, use of electronic signatures and more.
The Law Society also collaborated with the judiciary, government and government agencies to implement pandemic response measures, such as a process for virtual commissioning of affidavits, temporary suspension of limitations and remote witnessing of certain legal documents.
We asked: Which of these measures worked? For those that did not, what could be done to make them more effective? Were there other regulatory requirements or measures of the courts, government and government agencies that were barriers to access to justice that the Law Society should address?
The Law Society asked for feedback to be submitted by July 30, 2021. The Society also held several virtual town hall sessions for lawyers practising in various areas of the province, as there may be different barriers faced by different regions.
-
- Rule of Law and Lawyer Independence
- Lawyer Independence and Self Regulation
- Statements on Issues that Affect the Rule of Law
- Secondary School Essay Contest
- Rule of Law Lecture Series
-
- Rule of Law Matters Podcast
- Introduction to the Rule of Law transcript
- What is the rule of law vs. rule by law? transcript
- Lawyer Independence and the Rule of Law transcript
- The Rise of Authoritarianism and Assaults on the Rule of Law, Part 1 transcript
- The Rise of Authoritarianism and Assaults on the Rule of Law, Part 2 transcript
- COVID 19 and the Rule of Law, Part 1 transcript
- COVID 19 and the Rule of Law, Part 2
- Privacy and the rule of law
- Authoritarianism, closer to home
- Judges and the rule of law transcript
- COVID-19 and returning to "normal"
- The role of prosecutors in criminal justice and the rule of law transcript
- Rule of law news: a year in review
- Racism, equity, diversity and inclusion and the rule of law
- A conversation with Marie Henein on the role of lawyers in society
- Improving Mental Health for the Legal Profession
- Lawyer Development Initiatives